<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye To Black Boxes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://all-things-aviation.com/aviation-safety/black-boxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://all-things-aviation.com/aviation-safety/black-boxes/</link>
	<description>Informing, Educating &#38; Entertaining Pilots About All Things Aviation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Embry-Riddle Aero Student</title>
		<link>http://all-things-aviation.com/aviation-safety/black-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Embry-Riddle Aero Student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://all-things-aviation.com/?p=541#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I am on the side of the individual with the argument that 10 lbs &quot;will save fuel costs&quot; ....I don&#039;t think so ...it&#039;s definitely a weak argument ... if those 10 lbs were passengers carry-on weight I could see an overall fuel savings ...the amount of information and investigative importance an blackbox has, outweighs the cost to fly the extra 10 lbs. Safety in this case is much less expensive than doing without it, and then not knowing what have caused such an accident. Such devices improve upon aviation and, overall, reduce aviation deaths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am on the side of the individual with the argument that 10 lbs &#8220;will save fuel costs&#8221; &#8230;.I don&#8217;t think so &#8230;it&#8217;s definitely a weak argument &#8230; if those 10 lbs were passengers carry-on weight I could see an overall fuel savings &#8230;the amount of information and investigative importance an blackbox has, outweighs the cost to fly the extra 10 lbs. Safety in this case is much less expensive than doing without it, and then not knowing what have caused such an accident. Such devices improve upon aviation and, overall, reduce aviation deaths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does aviation need better black-boxes ? &#124; Plastic Pilot</title>
		<link>http://all-things-aviation.com/aviation-safety/black-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Does aviation need better black-boxes ? &#124; Plastic Pilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://all-things-aviation.com/?p=541#comment-101</guid>
		<description>[...] M. White posted an interesting article at all-things-aviation.com about black-boxes. The recent crashes of the AirFrance and Yemenia in the Ocean shown that recovering the black-boxes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] M. White posted an interesting article at all-things-aviation.com about black-boxes. The recent crashes of the AirFrance and Yemenia in the Ocean shown that recovering the black-boxes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @cleanwings</title>
		<link>http://all-things-aviation.com/aviation-safety/black-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>@cleanwings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://all-things-aviation.com/?p=541#comment-97</guid>
		<description>&quot;REMOVAL OF 10 POUNDS COULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT FUEL COST SAVINGS&quot;?!?  Are we pedaling these planes?  When was the last time you heard of an airplane of this size have an engine thrust rating measured down to the 10&#039;s of pounds?  Do the pilots ever request the plane to be fueled to 96,990 lbs instead of 97K, or have a baggage handler leave off a 10lb bag for &quot;significant fuel cost savings?&quot;  Come on, Hersch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;REMOVAL OF 10 POUNDS COULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT FUEL COST SAVINGS&#8221;?!?  Are we pedaling these planes?  When was the last time you heard of an airplane of this size have an engine thrust rating measured down to the 10&#8217;s of pounds?  Do the pilots ever request the plane to be fueled to 96,990 lbs instead of 97K, or have a baggage handler leave off a 10lb bag for &#8220;significant fuel cost savings?&#8221;  Come on, Hersch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
